IP Strategies Compared

Link Local (ZeroConf)

No infrastructure required, but IP addresses are random (169.254.x.x).

Disadvantages:
  • unpredictable
  • difficult to document
  • difficult to troubleshoot
  • external DHCP routers (third-party technicians) can corrupt the system
Suitability for Professional Live Productions
20%

Simple DHCP

Plug & Play, device receives IP automatically.

Disadvantages:
  • unpredictable (IP changes after restart)
  • No fixed routing can be planned
  • external DHCP routers (third-party technicians) can corrupt the system
Suitability for Professional Live Productions
40%

DHCP with MAC Reservations

Controlled IPs via central DHCP server

Disadvantages:
  • high maintenance effort upfront
  • device replacement or failure requires server reconfiguration
  • one DHCP server device required per production (but never more than one device) – > high planning and infrastructure effort
  • external DHCP routers (third-party technicians) can corrupt the system
Suitability for Professional Live Productions
70%

Static IPs with Decentralized DHCP

Static IPs and Plug & Play for additional devices.

Disadvantages:
  • Duplicate address assignment due to human error – > network outage
  • DHCP Pool Overlapping
  • Devices must be reset to internal standard settings after changes (dry hire)
  • external DHCP routers (third-party technicians) can only corrupt additional devices without static IPs
Suitability for Professional Live Productions
95%

IP Strategy Comparison for Dante Primary and Dante Secondary

Leave A Comment